Reply from Congressman Murphy

Today I received a response from Congressman Murphy on the issue of net neutrality. This was in response to my asking him to support it.

Dear Mr. O'Connell,

Thank you for writing my office about net neutrality. I appreciate being able to address your concerns.


The issue of net neutrality is an ongoing issue under review in the Energy and Commerce Committee, on which I serve. Though there is no single definition, the term "net neutrality" is used in reference to the practice of a network provider controlling a subscriber's access to Internet-based content. Supporters of "net neutrality" legislation argue that Congressional action is needed to prevent Internet service providers from building a multi-tier Internet. Under a multi-tier Internet, providers would bill users based on their consumption of bandwidth or limit unfettered access to content located outside the internal infrastructure. Net neutrality proponents worry that network providers will begin to favor content located on their internal network and restrict access to content located elsewhere.

Essentially, net neutrality legislation would allow the government to regulate access to the Internet. At this time, I see no impending threat to the Internet that requires legislation to protect access.

I remain concerned that "net neutrality" would actually limit consumer choices down the road by deterring innovation and other communications technology advances. The U.S. has enjoyed rapid expansion in high-speed Internet service and broadband applications in recent years, largely due to a balanced approach to Internet regulation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with further questions or concerns. If you are interested in receiving my email newsletter describing important votes and key committee activity, I invite you to visit my website at http://murphy.house.gov and sign up.

Sincerely,

Tim Murphy
Member of Congress